What is the difference between Collateralized Mortgage Obligations and other mortgage backed securities?

Rich P questioned:
How do CMO’s differ from any other mortgage-backed bundles? I know fannie mae finances primarily by selling the latter, so what is the benefit in CMO’s in comparison to them?


One Response to “What is the difference between Collateralized Mortgage Obligations and other mortgage backed securities?”

  • Ranto says:

    The original MBS were pass-through MBS — where the cash flows (principal plus interest) were passed through to the investors — except for a small piece of the interest that is taken out for servicing. Investors didn’t like the prepayment risks.

    In the mid-1980s, Dexter Senft — then the head of Fixed Income Research at First Boston — came up with the thought for CMOs. With a CMO, the cash flows of the MBS are filtered into several different bonds — each having a different risk profile. These were called Tranches or Classes. Some tranches had very small prepayment risk — while others had a lot. The thought was that by breaking the cash flows into several tranches, it would allow investors to buy pieces that fit their risk profile.

Leave a Reply

Mortgage Books on Amazon
Online Poker
Online Poker

I have registered to play in the PokerStars World Blogger Championship of Online Poker! The WBCOOP is a free online Poker tournament open to all Bloggers, so register on WBCOOP to play.

Registration code: 717481